the cat's disguised as a cinnamon loaf in the basket under the treadle machine my arms are torn and the backs of my hands the cat's disguised by his cinnamon bands what the wind whispers it might not mean my head is shorn the backs of my hands feel the first patters of an oncoming rain this wetness whispers what i can't explain a jet lays a trail of condensation down over the splattery pattern of the rain low low ceiling aglow with city light jetstream dipped way down south tonight in the basket on the treadle of the sewing machine the furniture aflicker with candlelight sandalwood aloft in the living room cat's on his back in the guise of the moon
If you’re interested in this sort of thing, the form I’m using in this poem is known locally as the “randometer” after Randy Sproat, who invented it. My best description of the form is: A series of quatrains in which the first line of each stanza is repeated in the fourth line of the same stanza, and the third line of each stanza is repeated in the second line of the following stanza. End rhymes are optional, as is the number of stanzas, and no meter is prescribed, giving the name of the form its double meaning.
I don’t repeat the prescribed lines verbatim. That might be cheating, you decide. What I like to do instead is to borrow some feature—a word, a phrase, or something close in sound or meaning—from the first and third lines and repeat that. In this one I also borrow from the second line of the first stanza (otherwise the only line in the poem that does not “repeat”) for the first line of the final stanza and from the first line of the poem for the last line of the poem, because it makes me happy sometimes to bookend a poem that way.
So…are you interested in that sort of thing?
If you don’t mind, leave a comment, yea or nay.


I am interested, learning from your reflection and sharing on the poem about poetry, which I love but do not create myself (yet). Thanks for this Vin.
nay on explanation but not on style...but that's because I resist form. It's not nae against doing things like this, it's the idea that I would constrain myself that's weird. So I didn't notice that you did it, then you explained it, but I was not better off knowing, and I have no counter-factual experience to tell me if it would have been better without it, since that poem isn't this poem, so I guess I just prefer the poetry without the explanation, and then I can feel smart "if" I notice it? Either way, I loved this poem and I love experimentation and homage, so it's all a GOOD wash for me! I loved this poem and especially the line, "this wetness whispers what i can't explain" BRILLIANT